A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:00 on December 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) refused a victim’s request to leave the victim’s “D” operated by the victim C on the 1st underground floor in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) brought the victim’s request to the effect that “A female employees fright to drink at the seat 72 without drinking alcohol; and (c) continued to comply with the victim’s request to the effect that “A female employees fright to drink fright to drink fright to drink fright to drink PC; and (d) continued to comply with the victim’s request to leave the victim’s room.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's PC business by force for up to 30 minutes.

2. On December 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) expressed at around 18:08 around 18, 2017, at the places indicated in paragraph 1; (b) expressed that “I am feasia” was required to present an identification card from F after receiving a report on the interference with the foregoing duties; and (c) expressed that “I am F’s clothes were taken once a week.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of images taken by the police officer in mobilization);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant has a criminal record once due to violent crimes, the defendant reflects his fault in depth, and all of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are shown in the records, shall be determined like the order.