(영문) 울산지방법원 2021.02.09 2020고단4813

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2021.02.09 2020고단4813

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

On October 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.047% among blood transfusions on October 24, 2020, while driving the said car, and driving it under the influence of 0.047% on the direction of the E hospital from D Empt.

Since there are no signals, it was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing the speed prior to entering the intersection and driving safely.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was negligent in entering a private distance intersection, the part of the victim F (the 57-year-old G 57-year-old) driving on the left side of the driving direction of the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the Defendant’s vehicle’s front part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s left top.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the following and the pelvise’s tymorry in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

2. On April 10, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act by the Ulsan District Court on April 10, 2007

Nevertheless, on October 24, 2020, the Defendant driven B-low-income vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.047% alcohol level from around the front road of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, to the front road of Ulsan-gun C-do, Ulsan-do, to around 300 meters.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) or 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement by the accused, reporting on the occurrence of traffic accidents, intensity, photographs, survey report on actual condition, notification of the results of crackdown on driving of drinking, statement report on the situation of the driver who takes driving, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on driving of drinking;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2016.06.30 2016고단1131

-울산지방법원 2018.01.17 2017고단3632

-울산지방법원 2017.07.05 2017고단816

-울산지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고단2204

-울산지방법원 2017.06.20 2017고단1343