logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.08.14 2013고단2696
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution on September 26, 2012 by the Busan District Court for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc.

1. On March 10, 2013, around 04:00, the Defendant driven a car with approximately 4 km up to the road front of the Sil-dong, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, for a car without a car driver’s license, from the road front of the Sil-dong, Sil-dong, Seo-gu, Seoul.

2. The Defendant was driving the said car at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1 and continued to proceed with it.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and has the duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting well the traffic situation on the right and right and right and right and right and the right and right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a string and parked on the left side of the driving direction, and shocked into the front part of the Defendant’s left side of the string of the string-down car owned by D, which was parked on the left side of the driving direction, due to the shock, and the said string-down car followed by the string-down car and the front part of the string-down car owned by the victim E, which was parked on the string-down, and shocked into the front part of the string-down car, and the said string-down part of the said string-down car, which was parked on the left side of the driving direction, due to the shock, led to the shock of the said string-down car.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the property that is equivalent to KRW 2,665,00 of the repair cost for the front-hander of New Fenzers or a car, which is a damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

3. The Defendant, as the act described in paragraph 2, destroyed the vehicles owned by D, E, and G and left the scene without any measure despite the Defendant’s immediate stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow