1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the counterclaim claims added by this court are dismissed.

2. Appeal;

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, even if the defendant added each description of evidence Nos. 7 through 12 (including additional numbers) that the defendant submitted in this court of first instance.

[However, in the reference document for the reference of May 26, 2020, submitted by the defendant after the closing of argument in the court, the plaintiff subscribed to the liability insurance for the owner of the facility, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for the main lawsuit should be dismissed as it is illegal as there is no benefit of confirmation. Thus, the plaintiff's claim for the main lawsuit should be additionally dismissed as there is an apprehension and danger in the legal status of the plaintiff, and there is a benefit of confirmation to remove the plaintiff's claim for damages as the counterclaim of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's claim for the main lawsuit is accepted as reasonable, and the defendant's claim for the counterclaim is dismissed as there is no reason. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate as the defendant's appeal and the counterclaim added by this court is dismissed as all of the grounds. It is so decided as per Disposition.