1. All appeals against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the claims added at the trial.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the Plaintiff’s addition of “three floors of first instance No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance” to “a removal of all the facilities, such as partitions, electric facilities, and air conditioners, inside the body” in relation to the claim added by the court of first instance, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit, and the defendant's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remainder of the counterclaim is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed all the plaintiff's claim for delivery of the third floor of the building of this case, the unpaid rent, and the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to rent. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the principal lawsuit of this case and counterclaim and the claim for removal added in the trial of the party is dismissed as it is without merit.