logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.02.13 2013고단6323
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B From February 2, 2010 to October 7, 2013, from the 12th floor of the building in Daegu Jung-gu, the victim F (Representative G), the 12th floor of the mobile phone E, as a member in charge of inventory such as the inventory of the mobile phone, etc., Defendant A had been working as a member of the victimized company from March 201 to October 1, 2013.

The Defendants habitually stolen the cell phone owned by the victimized company through 24 times as follows. Defendant B alone stolen the cell phone owned by the victimized company on 42 occasions. Defendant A aided and abetted Defendant B’s theft act on 28 occasions and stolen the cell phone on 27 occasions.

1. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct stolen a mobile phone terminal which was kept in storage from time to time in a warehouse where a member in charge of inventory stores a mobile phone, using an opportunity to download the mobile phone and received money from the stolen businessman.

From March 13, 2012 to 14:00 following the day from March 3, 2012 to 14:00 following the day, the Defendant stolen five mobile phone terminals with the total market value of 165,000 won, which are owned by the company, from the storage of the mobile phone of the victimized company, by using the gaps in around the storage of the mobile phone of the victimized company, and by taking off five cell phone terminals of the used mobile phone terminals with the total market value of 165,00 won, from the end of that time to April 26, 2013.

2. Defendant B thief and Defendant A thief

A. From May 1, 2012 to 13:00 to 14:00 on May 1, 2012, Defendant B used a gap in the surrounding surveillance failure to take place in the storage warehouse of the victimized company, Defendant B used a gap in the market value of the victimized company, which is the total of KRW 1,80,000, which is the ownership of the victimized company, to theft two cell phone cell phoness from the upper bank.

arrow