Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 4, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant located in Kuju-si B around May 4, 2016, raised the Defendant’s complaint on the ground that the content of the Defendant’s report, who is the reporter affiliated with C, using the Defendant’s mobile phone, did not in mind.

To carry out a fair press;

The external media labor union sees the foundation of the Republic of Korea, and if there is conscience, the above-line group should not be seen as a stimulative behavior that respects the core staff of the network and the press union as long as he knows that Drar is a core staff of the network and the press union, it should not be viewed as a stimulous behavior that respects the core staff of the network and the press union.

“The text message of E press shall be drawn up and transmitted to a large number of local press reporters, including F reporters belonging to E media and H reporters belonging to G, written out the above contents, and posted on the “I NAD” bulletin, in which the Defendant works as a member, and “The core trillion staff C company D reporters belonging to each group of the government-wide groups, who sees a stroke, will be released permanently from the media media.”

The author written a letter "duplicating the distorted Report" and posted it on the Defendant's Internet bulletin board.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as news report materials;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant’s writing written in order to criticize C’s distorted articles, and it cannot be seen as insulting expressions, and the D reporter is insulting.