logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.03.21 2018고단21
주거침입등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence No. 3 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Seized evidence 2.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on the Seoul Central District Court on August 18, 2017 and completed the execution of the sentence.

1. On October 27, 2017, around 13:00 on October 27, 2017, the Defendant came to the house of the victim D located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul, and opened and opened a bank window without any correction of the gas pipes for the purpose of cutting off the victim’s goods, and went to the house of the victims located in the total of six sites, such as the list of crimes, from around that time to December 12 of the same year.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence.

2. The Defendant: (a) entered the house of the victim D at the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph; (b) opened the house of the victim D; and (c) opened the cash of KRW 300,000,000,000, which is one of the victims in the front west, from around that time to December 12, 200; and (d) up to five (5) as described in the attached Table Nos. 1 to 3 and Nos. 5 to 6, a total sum of five (5) victims’ house from the victim’s house.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. AH statement, etc.;

1. Protocols of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (victimd phone call);

1. Investigation report (victim's I telephone call);

1. Investigation report (referring to a report on hearing statements from a victim G phone);

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from victims - to verify the market price of certain damaged goods);

1. Detailed information on the trade of the case;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a report on investigation (referring to inquiries about the current status of expropriation of a suspect A);

1. Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of punishment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow