The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the partnership B.

At around 12:30 on January 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) destroyed its utility by removing parts using a dricker and a hick in three digital fishing spaces of the office entrances of the first floor association owned by the victim B, on the ground that the Defendant found a ballot box for the dismissal of the head of the association, which was implemented by the association B located in Yeong-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, in order to find out the ballot box for the dismissal of the head of the association.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Two copies of a damaged photograph;

1. Investigation report (victim E and telephone call report);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on reference F and telephone calls);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the circumstances under the grounds for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (in light of the following favorable circumstances), and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relation, family relation, etc. before and after the crime, the defendant, who has suspended the sentence for the defendant as stated in the disposition, has been led to destruction of the defendant’s property without permission, and is against himself/herself; the victim’s union is not subject to punishment against the defendant; the victim’s union members wanting to dismiss the defendant; there are only circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances leading to the defendant’s occurrence in this case; and there are only a history of punishment for a minor fine.