1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The court's explanation of this case in this case is set forth in Section 2.B.

(3) Except for changing paragraph (6) (Chapter 1 to 4 of the same page), changing " Qa" in Part 6 to "E", and applying Part 7 to "the court of first instance" in Part 7 to "the court of first instance", it is identical to that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Accordingly, it shall be accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. (3) The part of the change is different from one another, and the defendant entered into the contract of this case by mistake that the owner of farmland can receive agricultural loss compensation even if he did not establish a farmer's death, and thus the contract of this case is cancelled. As such, in order to establish an error in the expression of intent as prescribed in Article 109 of the Civil Act, it must be deemed that there is a mistake in fact that there is no fact at the time of the juristic act, or there is no fact that there is no fact that there is no fact at the time of the juristic act, and as such, it is against the perception of the surveyor and the fact that there is no fact that there is no fact that there is an omission in the future at the time of the act, it cannot be said that there is a disagreement with the psychological condition of the surveyor, and that there is no error in the fact that there is no difference between the owner of farmland and the fact that there is no difference between the owner of farmland and the owner of farmland, even if the defendant actually resides in the area where the farmer actually resides in accordance with the Enforcement Rule of the Act.