logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.13 2017나2040458
매매대금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The decision of the court of first instance No. 3. A on the parts after the dismissal.

(ii)Paragraph (b) of this paragraph has been raised as follows:

【B) In order to have an error in the expression of intent under Article 109 of the Civil Act, there should be a mistake in the fact that there was no fact at the time of the juristic act, or a mistake in the fact that there was no fact that there was no fact that there was no fact. Thus, the Plaintiff cannot be said to be a mistake in the fact that there was an omission in the future at the time of the act, unless it is possible for the Plaintiff to find out that there was an omission in the fact that there was no fact at the time of the act, and that there was an omission in the fact that there was no fact at the time of the act, the Plaintiff could not be said to have been aware of the fact that there was an omission in the psychological condition of the satise and that there was an omission in the status of the satise (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 71Da2193, Mar. 28, 197; 2006Da15755, Aug. 23, 2007).

arrow