logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.9.25. 선고 2019두46855 판결
반환명령등처분취소
Cases

2019Du46855 For revocation of disposition, such as an order for return

Plaintiff Appellant

A Stock Company

Attorney Kim Young-chul, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Defendant Appellee

The head of the Central Regional Employment and Labor Office;

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu77045 Decided May 21, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

September 25, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per

September 25, 2019

Judges

Justices Park Jung-hwa

Justices Kwon Soon-il

Justices Lee Ki-taik

Justices Kim Jong-soo

arrow