logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.04.08 2019고단5892
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the Daegu District Court on July 11, 2007, the defendant was notified of a summary order of one million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-do.

1. Although the Defendant violated the provisions of the Road Traffic Act prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol at least once, on September 16, 2019, at around 04:23, the Defendant driven a DNA-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.214% from the parking lot of the building B in the 3km-gun of the Gyeongbuk-do to the front road of the building C.

2. On September 16, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven the frighting car while under the influence of alcohol 0.214% on blood alcohol level on September 16, 2019, and led the Defendant to drive the said frighting car at a 0.214% level, depending on the two lanes in front of the frighting C building in the e elementary school located at the e-school level from the e-school level.

At this point, since the center line of yellow-ray is installed, the defendant engaged in the driving of motor vehicles had a duty of care to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle on the front side and to safely operate the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, in full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of the injured party F, who is proceeding in the opposite lane to the Defendant’s car driving by neglecting this, the Defendant’s negligence, and the Defendant’s negligence, can be known that the Defendant driven by F, and the injured party in the judgment is H, who took advantage of the foregoing combined vehicle. As such, the Defendant did not interfere with the defense of the instant case that the Defendant led to his confession, thereby ex officio correcting ex officio. The part on the left side of the Defendant’s car driving’s Gone Star car riding was received as the part on the left side of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to a victim H (V, 67 years old) who was on board the above Lone Star Co., Ltd. through occupational negligence as above, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.F.

arrow