logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2020.06.10 2019고단4185
사기미수등
Text

1. The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Attempted fraud;

A. On January 6, 2019, Defendants B and C conspired with each other to sell the same amount of KRW 6,200,000,000, to the victim F, who reported Internet advertising at E office located in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si, and discovered the same. As such, Defendant C’s false representation that “this bid is low in price because it was several times at auction,” which shows that the victim F, who found Internet advertising, will be sold at KRW 6,200,00.”

However, in fact, the above passenger cars did not have been sold as valuable goods, and there was no bid for auction. The Defendants entered into a sales contract for the above passenger cars from the beginning, and the actual sale price is 62 million won, and the contract is false and the contract price is false and no choice but to purchase other vehicles without any choice but with no choice but to purchase the other goods at a price higher than the market price.

The Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victim and had the victim sell the other vehicle at a lower price than the market price; (b) however, the victim did not report to the police and did not commit an attempted crime.

B. On February 9, 2019, Defendant B and Defendant A conspired with each other, the Defendants showed the conformity of the Internet Lone Starex with the victim H, who found the Internet advertisement at the E office located in Busan-si around 17:0 on February 9, 2019. The false statement stating that “The price is low due to the multiple inspections at auction, and the price is to be sold at KRW 6 million,” and that “the said vehicle was exported from India and re-exporteded from India, and the victim should pay the tax amount of KRW 60 million after purchasing the vehicle.”

However, in fact, the above van was not a valuable thing that can be sold, there was no bid at auction, and there was no reverse import in India, and the Defendants did not enter into a sales contract for the above van from the beginning.

arrow