(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2005. 10. 12. 선고 2005노2338 판결

In the case of "the act of similarity and intercourse using parts of the body, such as the mouth and anus, or implements" under Article 2 (1) 1 (a) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (amended by Act No. 7404 of March 24, 2005; hereinafter the same shall apply), "the act of inserting the body, such as the mouth and anus, or using the implements" is not only an example of a part of the body, but also an act of inserting the body inside the body, such as the mouth and anus, etc., and in such act, an act of taking the sexual organ into action under the influence of hand, as in the case of this case, constitutes the act of similarity and behavior that causes sexual satisfaction by using the hand, which is part of the body, and thus constitutes an act of similarity, the court below erred by misapprehending legal principles and acquitted the charged facts of this case.

2. The judgment of the court below

As to the facts charged of this case, the court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that the defendant's act of this case using hand constitutes the act of similarity and thus, it is reasonable to interpret that it is "an act of inserting bodily contact to obtain at least the degree of sexual satisfaction which can be seen as similar to that of sexual intercourse," and it is likely to excessively expand the scope of punishment because all physical contact acts to obtain sexual satisfaction accompanied by a quid pro quo correspond to the act of similarity and thus, it is likely that the scope of punishment is excessively expanded, in full view of the following: "an act of this case by the defendant using hand constitutes a moral criticism, but it does not constitute a act of similarity as provided by the law."

3. The judgment of this Court

위 법에서 유사성교행위를 정의함에 있어 구강·항문 뿐 아니라 그 밖의 신체의 일부나 도구를 이용하는 경우까지 포함하는 것으로 규정하고 있어 이 사건 범행과 같이 손을 이용하는 경우도 신체의 일부를 이용한 경우에 해당한다 할 것이고, 위 법에서 성교행위 뿐 아니라 유사성교행위까지 규율대상으로 정한 취지에 비추어 유사성교행위란 구강·항문 등 신체내부로의 삽입행위 뿐 아니라 그 밖의 신체의 일부 또는 도구를 사용하여 성교와 유사한 것으로 볼 수 있는 정도의 성적만족을 얻기 위한 신체접촉행위도 포함하는 것으로 해석해야 할 것인바( 대법원 2004. 2. 13. 선고 2003도4362 판결 참조), 이 사건 범행은 남성의 성기에 로션을 바르고 손으로 성기를 감싸 쥔 채 상하로 왕복운동 함으로써 성기를 자극시켜 사정에 이르게 하는 행위로서 성교와 유사한 것으로 볼 수 있을 정도의 성적만족을 얻기 위한 신체접촉행위에 해당한다고 봄이 상당하다 할 것이므로, 검사의 주장은 이유 있다.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, since the prosecutor's appeal is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is a person who operates a (trade name omitted) clinic located in Seoul (SOB omitted).

From September 23, 2004 to October 23, 2004, two shower rooms, one employees air room, and 12 rooms are installed in the shower room at 70 square meters above (trade name omitted), and 10 male grandchildren were received 60,000 won per capita and 30,000 won out of them were paid to female employees, and the above non-indicted 1 was engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. against 20 customers averaged a day by 1,000 male grandchildren, including the above similar act (here after referred to as “here afterculties”) by allowing them to compare with each other, thereby making them pay 30,000 won to female employees.