logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.11 2016나2001111
물품대금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Party’s status and previous supply transaction 1) The Plaintiff is a company engaged in manufacturing, wholesale and retail business, etc. of LED 2, 30G MIN 2, 30GY 2, 30GY 2, 30GHE 2, 30GHE 1, 77GHE 2, 30GHE 2, 77GM 937, 731 TUTS 2, 107, 300 M&C 16,00 for the first time in 2013 (i.e., 16,000 16,000 16,000 0,000 16,000 16,000,000 37GM 2,07,037,000 M&M 2,013.

B. On April 8, 2014, G representative director of the Plaintiff sent e-mail with the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s e-mail and content certification 1) the Defendant’s quality team leader (director) of the Defendant’s quality team to “exploiting written estimates” with the title “proption of written estimates” attached to “LED MD MDUE 1 set 38,018,200 won, SMPS inspector 1 set 42,697,600 won, business trips and personnel expenses, total amount of KRW 8,815,800, and total amount of KRW 88,800,00.” On the same day, C sent e-mail with the Defendant’s quality team leader of the Defendant’s quality team and the Defendant’s e-mail with the “proption 38,018,200 won,” the Defendant’s production team leader and the Defendant’s production team leader’s production 40G materials.

arrow