Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

1. On July 22, 2017, at around 00:01, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if he would normally pay the drinking value at the main points operated by the victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) ordered the victim to have three service providers.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the amount even if he received the amount from the injured party, such as there was no money to pay the alcohol value at the time, or there was no credit card that is able to pay, and there was no certain occupation, and he did not receive the payment from the injured party.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim, and was issued three sicks equivalent to the market price of 18,000 won from the victim, namely, the victim.

2. On July 22, 2017, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 01:12, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim C to take a bath at a large rate of 18,000 won and on the day of the preexisting credit rating of 150,000 won to the Defendant; (b) caused the victim and his/her employees to take a walk at a large rate; (c) caused the victim to tear the invoice received from the victim, and (d) caused the victim’s face, and (e) caused the victim to escape a disturbance of about 31 minutes, such as raising time expenses to the customer who was seated next seat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

3. On July 22, 2017, at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1, around 01:43, the Defendant: (a) expressed the desire to take the scene of the crime, such as the description in paragraph 2, on the ground that the police officer affiliated with the 3 team of the Ulsan Southern District Police Station D District Group 3 Team of the Ulsan District Police Station, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report 112, took the cell phone of this case; and (b) made the said E’s hand fall off the cell phone by putting the hand and harming the cell phone; and (c) expressed the said E’s desire to take the slope of the same district unit for which he did not pay the drinking value.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police in relation to C.