(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2015.04.16 2015고단60

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2015.04.16 2015고단60

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2014, the Defendant sentenced the Changwon District Court to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc., and completed the execution of the said sentence on January 16, 2015.

At around 04:42 on January 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the alleyway near the Defendant’s residence located in Syang-si, the Defendant: (b) reported that the Defendant was fright; and (c) the police officers E and F, of the Syang Police Station D police box called to the main place upon receiving a report that the Defendant was going to move to the Defendant’s residence; and (d) without any justifiable reason, said police officers were able to take the Defendant’s vehicle at the police station; (b) said police officers were able to take the Defendant’s vehicle at the police station; (c) said police officers were fright to fright, and f was fright to fright, and was fright to fright, and f was frighted to fright to fright to fright, and was fright to perform the duties of police officers for about 20 minutes in front of the defect that the police officer attempted to leave.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The sentence of a repeated crime is imposed in light of the fact that the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties is not committed immediately after the release of the offender, and the circumstances such as the violation of the provision of Article 35 of the Criminal Act and the degree of damage suffered by police officers are considered.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2020.01.28 2019고단1211

-부산지방법원 2014.07.03 2014고단3277

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.11.30 2016고단310

-광주지방법원 2018.07.20 2018고단1893

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.06.30 2015고단415