All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) asserts that the sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, while the prosecutor asserts that the sentencing of the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

However, in light of the content, motive, frequency, means, and method of each of the instant crimes, etc., the nature of the crime is not good, the defendant does not make efforts to recover the victims' damage, and there are many criminal records, such as fraud, and the fact that each of the instant crimes was committed without being aware of during the suspension period of execution due to fraud, etc. is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case does not exceed the amount of damage, and some of the crimes are attempted, the defendant does not have the same criminal record, the fact that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant recognizes a mistake and reflects it, and that the imprisonment

In addition, considering all other circumstances that serve as the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is deemed reasonable, and it cannot be deemed that it is too heavy or unreasonable.

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.