All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) asserts that the sentencing of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, while the prosecutor asserts that the sentencing of the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

The crime of this case, each of the crimes of this case committed on eight occasions and theft of cash, etc. by the defendant intrudes another person's residence at night. In light of the contents, motive, means, methods, danger, etc. of the crime, the criminal liability is grave, and the defendant is not aware of it during the period of repeated crime due to robbery, etc., and again commits each of the crimes of this case, which are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the amount of damage caused by each of the crimes in this case is not much high, and the fact that the defendant recognized the mistake and reflected it is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, considering all other circumstances that serve as the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is deemed reasonable, and it cannot be deemed that it is too heavy or unreasonable.

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.