A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

Punishment of the crime

From around February 2003, the Defendant served as the head of the working team at the company located in Seo-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, where the head of the working group would remove wastes from the factory machinery manufactured by drinking water, and returned to the work team again after retirement. From February 2, 2015, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim C, who became the head of the working group, due to the conflict of opinions regarding the Defendant’s order to work.

The Defendant was working at around 10:10 on January 8, 2016 at the workplace of the above △△△ enterprise, to remove brushes attached to the factory machinery with a view to work, from the above Victim C (67 tax).

If the day is the same, it shall be flashed and flashed to kill the victim by listening to the phrase “Wingk.”

Defendant 1 cited 34 cm in total length for the above work (34 cm in length) and tried to re-emit the victim’s head and face with the above watch by leading the victim, but the workplace club fee in the surrounding area did not bring about the Defendant’s abundance and control, and did not achieve that purpose.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to kill the victim, but attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. On-site photographs of the case;

1. Details of the report of the 112 case, investigation report (in relation to a doctor in charge of emergency treatment), investigation report (in relation to a counter investigation of a doctor in charge of emergency treatment), investigation report on recording telephone conversations 112, investigation report on recording of telephone conversations 112, investigation report (in relation to an investigation of a doctor in charge of emergency treatment), investigation report

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel regarding the pertinent legal provisions of the relevant criminal facts and Articles 254 and 250(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment (the option of imprisonment with labor with labor with labor for a limited period) and the defense counsel, the Defendant and the defense counsel at the time of the crime of this case did not intend to commit murder although the Defendant had committed the crime

The argument is asserted.

However, this Court has duly adopted and investigated.