1. The Defendant’s KRW 47,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from October 30, 2015 to October 12, 2016.

In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including various numbers), the plaintiff and the defendant concluded a contract with the purpose of each construction business. On December 22, 2014, the defendant concluded a contract with the plaintiff for the construction work of construction of a new factory at the Hancheon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter referred to as "non-party company") at the rate of KRW 250 million for the total construction cost of the construction work of the non-party 1, 50 million for the first part payment, KRW 10 million for the second part payment, KRW 50 million for the second part payment, KRW 50 million for the second part payment, and KRW 50 million for the remaining 00,000 for the second part payment after completion of the contract (hereinafter referred to as "contract of this case"). The defendant completed the construction and delivered the construction work of this case to the non-party 2, 200,000 won for the new building at the rate of KRW 2,005,0000 for the construction cost.

In regard to this, the defendant asserted that he paid the plaintiff the construction price of KRW 5,880,00 to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff received KRW 5,880,00 from the defendant, but if the purport of the whole argument is added to the statement in Gap evidence No. 5, the above amount can be acknowledged as not the construction price but the fact that it is the land registration cost paid by the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant's defense

In addition, the defendant will pay the construction cost of this case.