Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the head of the sales headquarters working at the branch office of Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Company”) on the second floor of the building E in light of light and has all the authority and responsibility concerning the indication of origin of kimchi products sold on the Defendant Company’s website management and website.

The defendant company is a juristic person to which defendant A belongs, which produces and sells kimchi.

1. No one shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the origin;

Nevertheless, from Sep. 1, 2011 to Mar. 22, 2012, Defendant A displayed the F company in Daegu on the drybuk-do movable property 620 km in Daegu, the 55,500 km in inner movable property, and the 18,000 km in the frontbuk-gu in Chungcheongnam-do in Chungcheongnam-do and the 18,000 km in the frontbuk-do in Chungcheongnam-do and two regions in Ansan-dong and two regions, and made it confused with the designated products (i.e., abandoned kimchi, total kimchi, heat-free kimchi, kimchi, kimchi, kimchi, spring kimchi, ice-gimchi, kimchi, kimchi, kimchi, kimchi, kimchi, kimchi, kimchi-gimchi, red-gimchi, red-gimking, red-gimchi, red-gimking, red-gimchi, red-ging, red-gimchi, red-ging, red-gimchi, red-greging, red-ging, etc.

2. As above, Defendant A, an employee of the Defendant Company, committed an act of indicating the origin of the Defendant Company as above.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. (1) The Defendants’ assertion (1) The production and management of the Defendant Company’s website should be conducted through the outsourcing company. Defendant A, who is the final manager of the website, should have modified the origin of the molds powder into “Cheongyang, etc.” or “domestic acid,” but has already been written only as “Cheongyang, etc.” in the past, even though it did not reach a long time after joining.