logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.06.26 2013고단600
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the trade name of “E” in Jeonnam Water City D, manufactured kimchi, such as the side chi, and sold kimchi by means of manufacturing kimchi in the way that he receives an order for kimchi from e-mail companies, such as e-mail diskettes, cuble, coop, etc., or directly receives orders from the website or telephone and delivers kimchi to the consumers by door.

No person shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication which may cause confusion as to the origin.

From May 1, 2012 to November 7, 2012, the Defendant purchased each of the G’s 12,140 g of the Chinese red powder powder 12,140 g of the Republic of Korea and 3,724 g of the Republic of Korea over a total of 40 times from the L of the operation of the H in Han-si, G, and from the L of the operation of the K in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju.

The Defendant, in fact from May 1, 2012 to November 7, 2012, in manufacturing and selling Chinese red powder, etc. in combination with domestic red powder and domestic red powder, as seen above, posted a sign board stating the origin of red powder in the E office as “domestic acid” and 100% of domestic acid material, highest domestic raw material, and daily natural material of 100% of the class 10% in the purchase of products on the E’s website and the e-commerce’s website, etc., with hand-kick, at the purchase of products on the E’s website and the e-commerce’s product.

The notice of the phrase of "kimchi", etc. posted and received an order of the kimchi from the social sphere users through the ordering place, such as F, with the false indication as if the country of origin of the red sphering powder was 100% in Korea.

As above, from May 1, 2012 to November 7, 2012, the Defendant falsely indicated the origin of agricultural and fishery products, and sold approximately approximately KRW 27,550 g and the total market price of approximately KRW 82,201,90 from around May 1, 2012 to around November 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Investigation reports social syrings;

arrow