1. On January 26, 2015, the Defendant’s disposition of non-recognition of aggregate work experience against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 21, 2003, the Plaintiff graduated from the department of regional development at Gangseo-gu University (at present, the name was changed to "Yungwon University"), and worked as the head of the urban planning division from October 8, 2003 to June 30, 2009 to the Urban Planning Department B, and from July 20, 2009 to December 31, 201, the head of the urban planning division in C, respectively.

After that, on December 14, 2012, the Plaintiff obtained a certificate of qualification as an urban planning engineer.

B. Around February 14, 2013, the chairperson of the Gangwon-do Personnel Committee publicly announced the Gangwon-do Employment Examinations for Local Public Officials (hereinafter “instant Employment Examinations”) implementation plan in 2013 as follows:

The number of persons to be selected, the number of persons to be selected, the number of persons to be selected, the number of persons to be selected shall be the Korean language, English, Korean history, the general theory of urban planning, and the land use plan.

C. On October 29, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for a request to define the salary class by aggregating the period of service at a private company’s private company on January 22, 2015, while he/she received a three-dimensional order from a local facility clerk on October 29, 2013 and served as the City Design Department on May 25, 2014.

On January 26, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on the ground that “The scope of recognition of career experience in the private sector according to the guidelines for handling local public officials’ remuneration work, etc. is similar in the event that the scope of recognition of career experience in the private sector is obtained a certificate of qualification in the relevant field of work, or where the career competition examination without qualification is recognized as a related field of work, and the Plaintiff does not fall under such guidelines

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) e.

The Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Gangwon-do Local Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on April 13, 2015.

【Ground for recognition】 Each entry and pleading of evidence Nos. 1 and 2