1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following order of payment shall be revoked, and

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "reasonablely, six pages 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be added to "(On the other hand, the defendant means a compromise made outside the litigation proceedings on the premise that the reconciliation under the above item (b) has been brought in a lawsuit for damages, but there is no specific ground to see it as such; and there is no reasonable ground to see any difference between the case in which a lawsuit for damages has been brought and the case in which a compromise is made without a lawsuit for damages has been brought," "3,850,374" of the nine pages 9, "3,850,364" of the first instance judgment "3,850,364," and "the two parallels are altered from 10,10,000 to 20,000 to 15,000 to 20,000,0000 to 10,000,0000 to 2,011, 18 or 1, 15.1.

2. The changed part

A. Part of the judgment of the court of first instance from the 6th to the 13th eth eth son

B. In light of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the facts as to the basis amount of successful remuneration and the purport of the entire arguments as to whether the aforementioned amount was excessive, the amount of contingent remuneration for the portion of a year shall be calculated on the basis of the settlement amount actually determined, 9,065,260,616, which is the amount of the settlement amount actually determined. The amount of the settlement amount for the portion of the past compensation determined by the above settlement shall be 9,567,58,860, which is one year.