1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) with KRW 19,828,165.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "87,570,242 won" in Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance is as "152,87,626 won"; "10,79,162 won" shall be as "35,778,746 won"; "97,679,404 won" in Part 1 and 3 shall be as "18,656,372 won"; "52,597,158 won" in Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance shall be as "527,289,74 won"; "319,126,138 won" in the last part of the judgment of the first instance shall be as "19,45,554 won at the site"; the part of the judgment of the first instance court shall be modified as "2 of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's second instance court's second second instance court's second instance court's second trial's second trial's second trial's second trial's second trial's second trial's second appeal and second appeal's second appeal's second appeal's second appeal.

2. The changed part

A. In relation to the last parallel to the 10th 7th 7th am of the first instance court judgment, the Plaintiff asserted that the actual construction volume of the Plaintiff’s construction at the Seosan-si site was 3,157m, 1.0m, 2,607m, 2,607m, 7,863m, 24, 770, 1,631m, 266m, 1,266m, 1,266m, 1,46m, 58, 000, 000 from the last parallel to the 10th 7th am of the first instance court judgment, and that the actual construction volume was 3,157m, 157m, 1,66m, 1,266m, 49m, 49m of the above construction price as claimed by the Plaintiff.

Gap evidence 7 29, 36 , respectively, and the first instance court and this court.