logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고단2452
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After the Defendant became aware of the so-called “work loan” business operator who received a loan from a financial institution by forging documents, etc. through online site search, the Defendant conspiredd with C, D, and E, the above business operator. The fact was that the Defendant, even though he did not have concluded a lease contract on an apartment owned by F, concluded a lease contract on the above apartment and paid a lease deposit with a financial institution by forging a real estate lease contract, etc. as if the Defendant had concluded a lease contract on the apartment owned

1. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) conspired with C, D, E, etc., and at the H Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office of the Hamsan-si, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si; (b) the Defendant took place as if he was a lessee; (c) as if he were a lessor, D took place as if he was a lessor; and (d) in the indication column of the real estate lease agreement in the column for real estate lease agreement, the proprietor’s address column stated “Yansan-si, Seosan-gu, I apartment 2,703”, “J and 703” in the resident registration number column, “K”, and “F” in the name column for the lessor’s address, and affixed the seal of F, who was aware of in advance on the name and side of the F.

In collusion with C, D, E, etc., the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On October 8, 2012, the Defendant in collusion with C, D, E, etc., filed an application for a loan to an employee in charge of lending that knew of the forgery, and submitted the forged real estate lease agreement as if it was duly formed.

3. The Defendant’s fraud in collusion with C, D, E, etc., submitted a forged real estate lease agreement to the employees in charge of the above bank at the time and place of the above “paragraph 2,” and the Defendant’s payment of KRW 170 million to the building owner and full payment.

arrow