beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
After the Defendant became aware of the so-called “work loan” business operator who received a loan from a financial institution by forging documents, etc. through site search, the Defendant conspiredd with the above business operator B, C, D, etc., and, in fact, the Defendant concluded a lease contract on the apartment owned by E even though the Defendant did not have concluded a lease contract on the apartment owned by E, and had paid the lease deposit by forging the real estate lease contract, etc., thereby obtaining a loan from a financial institution as security.
1. On January 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) conspired with B, C, and D to forge private documents; (b) at the G Real Estate Brokerage Office located in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City of Gyeonggi-gu, the Defendant was the lessee; (c) as if the Defendant was the lessee; and (d) as if the lessor was the lessor, C had the following: (a) in the indication column of the real estate in the real estate lease agreement, “HPT 101 Dong 508, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, APT 101 Dong 508; (b) in the indication column of the real estate in the real estate lease agreement; (c) stated “I” in the resident registration number column, “J” in the resident registration number column, “J”, and “E” in the name column of the lessor; and (d) affixed the seal of
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On January 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with B, C, D, etc., filed an application for a loan to an employee in charge of the loan in the Gu-U.S., Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gyeonggi-si; and (b) submitted the forged real estate lease agreement as if it were duly formed.
3. The Defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, submitted a forged real estate lease agreement to an employee in charge of the above bank loan at the time and place of the above “paragraph 2,” and the Defendant paid KRW 160 million to the owner of the building and transferred the lease amount.