1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant's 621,844 won and its relation to the plaintiff on October 14, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person established pursuant to the National Health Insurance Act, which provides insurance benefits to the insured under the same Act, and B is the insured of the above health insurance.

B. B, around 06:30 on February 24, 2013, while taking a bath at a public bath called “D” located in Chungcheong-gun C, Chungcheong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant’s operation, it was caused by an accident of inflicting an injury, such as a string cryp, which was installed to enter a cooling house (hereinafter “instant accident”). Accordingly, from February 24, 2013 to February 24, 2013.

4. up to March 1, 200, medical corporations located in Young-dong, Young-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, and that received medical treatment at the Young-dong hospital;

C. The sum of the medical expenses of B arising from the instant accident is KRW 1,554,610 as indicated below, and KRW 1,103,240 among them was borne by the Plaintiff, and KRW 451,370, respectively.

The Medical Fees for the Medical Service Date on February 24, 2013, KRW 342,070,070, KRW 1,242,150, KRW 149,120, KRW 80,300, KRW 229,420 on February 24, 2013; KRW 13,920, KRW 13,920 on March 20, 2013; KRW 39,820, KRW 120 on April 3, 2013; KRW 15,100, KRW 43,220 on the aggregate medical expenses for the Medical Service Date’s charges; KRW 1,103,240 on the aggregate; KRW 451,370, KRW 1554,610 on the medical expenses for the Medical Service Date’s charges; the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments, each of subparagraph 1 through 5, and each of subparagraph 1 through 5, respectively.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the defendant's liability for damages and the fact that the plaintiff's right to indemnity is recognized, although the defendant, who is the operator of a public bath, has a duty of care to take appropriate measures to prevent the users from getting out of the public bath by installing a guide sign to the effect that the public bath can be slicked, or by urging him to pay attention, even if not, the defendant, who is the operator of the public bath, suffers bodily injury, since he did not install a sprink for the material of the public bath or install a guide sign to the above purport, the defendant did not cause injury to B.