logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.11 2012가단110154
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from March 21, 2010 to February 11, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The ground of liability 1) The Plaintiff, employed by the Defendant on March 21, 2010 at around 13:30, 2010, brought 15A U-V flicks in the STX Shipbuilding’s sea and brought 15A U-V flicks in order to carry out a melting work in relation to the installation of STX Shipbuilding’s 129 Q block pipe, and felled into the floor at a height of 1.5 meters and fell into the floor to the left flicks and sustained injuries, such as the mouth in the left flicks (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff safety mother and safety.

However, when an employer instructs a worker to work using a bridge, the employer should allow the worker to use the bridge equipped with a device for preventing the stringing of materials with a large studs at the lower part of the wall column of the bridge, and the string of the bridge should be used to prevent the string of the workers from falling down on the road, etc., but the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with a string-type bridge without safety measures as seen above at the time, and did not properly supervise the Plaintiff that the string of the string string by using U-V only by the hand of the Plaintiff with U-V.

B. As incidental obligations under the good faith principle accompanying an employment contract, an employer is obligated to take necessary measures, such as arranging human and physical environment so that an employee does not harm life, body, and health in the course of providing labor. In order to protect the Plaintiff who is an employee, the Defendant failed to take necessary safety measures, such as preparing physical facilities to prevent the fall accident and supervising the proper work attitude, etc. In order to protect the Plaintiff, which is an employee, but failed to do so. Accordingly, the instant accident occurred.

arrow