The defendant is innocent.

1. On July 20, 2015, the summary of the facts charged stated that “The victim E of the 1304 disaster shall lose the purpose of the meeting of occupants, and shall carry out the legal procedure of recommendation for dismissal because he/she has gross negligence preventing the chairperson from carrying out his/her meeting, so that he/she may not carry out the meeting on the part of the defendant at the wall of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment without distinction between 1-13 and 13,” and under the title, “E shall be criticized and attacked by all persons attending this meeting, who have lost its character,” and “when he/she publicly announced the fact that he/she would not interfere with the normal development of the meeting,” he/she shall not be able to publicly announce the fact that he/she would not interfere with the settlement of defamation by publicly announcing the fact that he/she would not interfere with the normal development of the meeting.”

2. The following circumstances revealed by the record of judgment, namely, the said apartment management committee, from July 11, 2015, confirmed the contents of the statement No. 1 to 13 written in the above proposal for dismissal, which was recorded by the victim’s statement from around July 1, 2015, and confirmed the contents of the statement No. 1 to 13, which was recorded in the above proposal for dismissal. The committee received a written vindication from the victim and examined it. The committee for the election management, after the procedure for verifying the above facts, moved the contents of the proposal for dismissal submitted by the Defendant to the substitute for the notification to the occupant.