1. The part against the defendant regarding the claim for confirmation of the judgment of the court of first instance and the payment of money below is below.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, other than the following, is the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, Article 11 of the 11 of the 111 of the 111 of the 111 of the 13th "the difference between wages, etc. except for long-term continuous service allowances, and the total amount of long-term service allowances," which read "3. Determination" shall be amended as follows, and Article 2 of the 13th through 25th of the 25th of the 25th of the 13th of the 13th of the 25th of the 25th of the 3th of the 14th of the 2016th of the 3th of the 3th of the 201th of the 3th of the 2016th of the 2016th of the 4th of the 2016th of the 196th of the 2nd of the 2016th of the 2016th of the

Therefore, we examine whether Article 42 (2) of the Personnel Management Regulations and Article 7 (1) of the Remuneration Regulations apply to the plaintiffs.

In full view of the facts acknowledged earlier and the following circumstances revealed in each of the personnel regulations and remuneration regulations of the instant case, Article 42(2) of the Personnel Management Regulations and Article 7(1) of the Remuneration Regulations cannot be deemed as the rules of employment applicable to the Plaintiffs before full-time conversion.

According to Article 3 of the Personnel Management Regulations and Article 2 of the Remuneration Regulations, the above provisions shall apply to all working conditions, such as personnel management and remuneration, except as otherwise provided for in other internal regulations.

On the other hand, according to Articles 1 and 2 of the "Non-regular Employee Management Regulations", the contract positions other than regular employees are concluded.