logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.10.15 2013고정480
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who runs a secondhand sales business. A.

Definite, the Defendant was boarding B private taxi in front of the Gyeongnam Bank, which was located in the counter of Changwon-si, and had the entrance of Masan-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, on May 7, 2013.

The defendant did not get off the taxi due to the influence of alcohol, and did not get off the taxi.

Therefore, D(61) which is a taxi engineer has reported to 112.

Around 22:30 on May 7, 2013, the victim slopeF (the age of 44) who is a police officer of the Minsan East Police Station Estation called this, the Defendant shouldered the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant expressed the said F at the entrance of the Changwon-si C apartment at the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwondong, that he reported to the police, that he reported a certain dog to the police, that he was able to move to the Defendant, that he was able to talk about five minutes, and that he publicly insultingd the victim.

B. Property damage the Defendant destroyed property damage equivalent to KRW 1,425 on the ground that the victim D(the age of 61) did not have cash to demand the taxi expenses, and thus, the victim was unable to settle the card payment. The Defendant left the mobile phone in his hand in the Acrypt of a taxi qualification certificate installed in a taxi and destroyed the market price by putting it in the Acrypt of a taxi qualification certificate installed in a taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 311 and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of each fine (i.e., confession, reflectivity, and the point agreed with victim D), respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act including days of pre-trial detention;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow