1. The part of the conjunctive claim in the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

3...

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff is a subdivision that consists of the descendants of HP 24 years of age I as its members, and the Defendants are the members of the subdivision.

The forest land of this case (hereinafter referred to as “the forest land of this case”) 5,371 square meters in F forest land in Gohap-gun, Gyeongnam-gun (hereinafter referred to as “the forest of this case”) is 1921.

3.2. The J has received a ruling;

on December 31, 1970, K completed the registration of ownership transfer under the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Forest Land (Act No. 2111, May 21, 1969; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) with respect to the forest of this case, and G completed the registration of ownership transfer under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Forest Land (Act No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”).

G died on December 21, 2014, and the Defendants, the children of G, completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 22, 2015 with respect to each of the instant 1/4 shares out of the forest land by agreement and division.

[Ground for recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the absence of dispute, the entries in Gap’s evidence Nos. 2 through 7 (including a branch number if a branch number exists) and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the primary claim for the purport of the entire pleadings, is the place where I and wife were buried, and the Plaintiff entered into a title trust agreement with the J. 28 years old descendants and was given a ruling as to the instant forest under the name of the J.

Since then, K had not purchased the forest land of this case, on December 31, 1970, completed the registration of initial ownership by false guarantee, and on May 27, 1994, transferred its ownership to the Plaintiff on May 27, 1994, however, the Plaintiff was unable to register the name of the Plaintiff and completed the registration of ownership transfer under G name after concluding a title trust agreement with the Plaintiff’s small members G.

The Plaintiff terminated the title trust with respect to the Defendants, who are the inheritors of G who succeeded to the status of the trustee upon the service of the duplicate of the instant complaint, by serving the duplicate of the instant complaint. The Defendants caused the termination of the title trust with respect to the forest of this case to the Plaintiff.