logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.06.11 2013구단55270
국가유공자유족비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the Army on January 26, 2010 and was discharged on November 15, 201.

On November 26, 2011, after discharge, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the increase in the leuk blood transfusion accompanied by an empty blood,” by a medical school in the medical branch of the next generation school, and was diagnosed as “hymal chronic tymal chronic tymal tymosis, acute tymical tymosis, and non-sulphical tymosis,” and was hospitalized from February 17, 2012 to April 25, 2012.

Since then, the state of the Syna Hospital was hospitalized from February 27, 2013 to April 16, 2013. However, on April 16, 2013, the disease was caused by chronic leuk typosis (the first event).

B. Around May 21, 2013, the Plaintiff, the father of the deceased, died of leuk-dolary work in steel book and work stress during the military unit life, and applied for registration as a bereaved family member of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State. On October 8, 2013, the Defendant, following the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, notified the Plaintiff of the determination on whether he is a bereaved family member of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “the instant disposition”) and his bereaved family member on the ground that “A person was discharged from military service and was medically recognized to have died within two years after he was discharged from military service due to the disease that occurred during the military service and the disease was medically recognized to have died within two years after he was discharged from military service.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 10, 17 evidence, Eul 1 through 4 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the GOP of the 21st century after the Plaintiff was killed in Korea.

arrow