1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim is the cause of the instant claim, and the Plaintiff lent KRW 200,000,000 to D upon introduction of B on June 10, 2016, and the Plaintiff jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligation. B, in collusion with the Defendant for the purpose of evading compulsory execution by creditors including the Plaintiff, in excess of the obligation, concluded a trust contract as of September 12, 2016, which was the only real estate stated in the separate sheet, in collusion with the Defendant for the purpose of evading compulsory execution by the creditors, including the Plaintiff, and sought implementation of the procedures for the cancellation of trust contract and the cancellation of ownership transfer registration.

On the other hand, the evidence presented by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the above trust contract was a fraudulent act, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, in full view of the evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including paper numbers), each statement of evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including paper numbers), and the whole purport of the pleadings in the witness E’s testimony, with respect to real estate listed in the attached list, the registration of creation of mortgage that was formed with the debtor, B, and Korean bank as a bank for the above collateral debt was completed on Nov. 28, 2013 (the change of maximum debt amount to KRW 240,60,000 on Nov. 16, 2015), and the above assertion by the plaintiff is without merit since the trust contract was concluded with the beneficiary for a loan of KRW 196,00,000 on September 12, 2016.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.