logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2015.11.04 2015나1296
소유권말소등기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

Reasons

With respect to this case, our court's explanation is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as it deducts any addition of the following Paragraph 2.

In addition, there was a dispute with the Defendant at the time when the Plaintiffs entered into each of the instant trust agreements with the Defendant with the land owner, and the creditors of the Plaintiff A filed a lawsuit for revocation of fraudulent act regarding the instant apartment sales agreement. However, even if the trust agreement was concluded as a voluntary auction for part of the instant apartment, it was a situation in which the Defendant was unable to perform the contractual obligation before the expiration of the period, even though the Defendant was unable to perform the contractual obligation before the expiration of the period, the Plaintiff A incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 40 million to the Defendant by concluding each of the instant trust agreements

(3) In light of the above legal principles, each of the trust contracts of this case was concluded by the Defendant on the ground that each of the trust contracts of this case was concluded by the Defendant, and that each of the trust contracts of this case was concluded by the Defendant on the ground that each of the trust contracts of this case was concluded by the Defendant on the ground that each of the trust contracts of this case was concluded by the Defendant on the ground that each of the trust contracts of this case was concluded by the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant’s obligation to cancel the ownership transfer registration of this case following the termination of

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party.

arrow