1. Defendant A, B, C, and D Defendant A with a fine of three million won, Defendant B with a fine of five million won, and Defendant C with a fine of five million won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, as the representative of the JJ, proposed to enter the Republic of Korea by falsely inviting foreigners who wish to be employed in the Republic of Korea in consultation with China and Vietnam, with China and Vietnam, for the purpose of export consultation, the Defendant agreed to lend the name of the KJ to the said KJ and to acquire the price.

On January 21, 201, the Defendant lent the name of the KJ to K, and K has prepared a letter of invitation stating that the export transaction partner of the KJ is invited for export consultation and contract, and in collusion with K, etc., by inviting Chinese L by submitting data of the KJ related to visa issuance to the KJ to the K officer in charge of the state, and allowing it to enter through the Incheon Airport on February 2, 2011, in collusion with K, etc. on the following grounds: (a) on February 2, 2011, the Defendant sold the name of the KJ, and (b) on January 21, 201, by inviting three foreigners to enter the Republic of Korea by unlawful means, such as in

2. As the representative of the Co., Ltd., Defendant B, in collusion with China and Vietnam, etc., and intended to enter the Republic of Korea by falsely inviting foreigners who wish to be employed in the Republic of Korea from China and Vietnam for the purpose of export consultation, the Defendant agreed to lend the name of the said Co., Ltd. to the Republic of Korea, and to acquire the price.

On June 16, 201, the Defendant lent to K the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and K has prepared a false invitation letter stating that the exporting customer member of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. is invited to export counseling and contract, and in collusion with K, etc., by inviting Chinese N, and allowing them to enter the Incheon Airport on July 9, 201, by submitting data of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. related to the issuance of a visa to the general partner of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and in collusion with K, etc. on July 9, 201, to allow them to enter the Republic of Korea or to refuse to issue a visa by inviting all seven foreigners by unlawful means, as shown in Appendix I No. 4 and No. 10 per annum

3. Defendant C.