Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts are established on October 14, 2013 by the Plaintiff for the purpose of manufacturing, processing, distributing, selling, etc. food related to agriculture, forestry product processing, and food processing, ginseng cultivation, and ginseng. Environment-friendly organic farming D is established on the following grounds: the lease period for each lease contract (the name of the lessee shall be the last day of each month) (the electricity user shall be paid, the lessee shall be 1,914 square meters prior to C (hereinafter “instant land”) and for plant cultivation owned by the Plaintiff on the ground, for five years from the end of November 2013 to the end of December 2018; the lease period for each free greenhouse for plant cultivation owned by the Plaintiff (50 square meters, 7 square meters and 25 square meters) shall be five years from the end of each month to the end of each month; the lease contract (the date of payment shall be the last day of each month) shall be determined by the Plaintiff’s representative; the Plaintiff shall be paid the rental fee to the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff shall be repaired to the Plaintiff’s free will be repaired; and the Plaintiff shall use the free will be repaired.
Since then, the Defendant cultivated D in the glass temperature room in the instant case, and, if rained, rainwater was leaked, and as the opening and closing date of the glass temperature room in the instant case is not closed in an open state, D cultivated by the Defendant was also dead.
(Other, the Defendant, on January 22, 2014, ordered the Plaintiff to restore the space located on the rear door of the glass room to its original state in favor of the Plaintiff at the time of the instant lease agreement, and there was no problem in using the ground water in favor of the Plaintiff (such as the location of water), and there was no problem in the use of the ground water at all, and the Defendant would have no defect in using the glass room. The Defendant requested a construction work of the rear door of the glass room on several occasions, but only the next day.