A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as he was delegated with the authority to dispose of the land Kimpo-si C and D, was in mind to acquire the purchase price from the victim E.

1. On December 15, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in F in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) at the sale price column, the Defendant, using the pen in the paper of the real estate sales contract using the pen in the form of the paper of the purchase and sale contract, stated in the column of the purchase and sale price; and (c) in the seller column, the Defendant: (a) stated in the seller column, “Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Ha-302 B”; and (d) sealed B’s seal in his name, and written the Defendant’s personal information in the agent column.

The Defendant continued to write “B” on the receipt form using the pen to the issuer column, and put the above B’s seal on his name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of a real estate sales contract in the name of B, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and a receipt in the name of B, which is a private document on a certificate of fact.

2. The Defendant: (a) issued a forged real estate sales contract and a receipt to the above E, who is aware of the forgery at the above date, at the above time, and at the above place, as if they were the document duly formed.

3. The Defendant, at the above date and time, told the said victim E to “B is the agent of the seller B, who will implement the promise without the mold,” and, at the above time and place, suggested the forged real estate sales contract and the receipt 1 as if he were the lawful agent of the said real estate owner B, and deceiving the victim by citing the above forged real estate sales contract and the receipt 1.

However, the defendant was not the agent of B and was not delegated with the authority to dispose of the above real estate by B, and there was no intention or ability to dispose of the above real estate even if the purchase price was paid by the victim.