Text
Defendant
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.
2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against himself/herself; (b) chronic renal failure, high voltage, and urology, etc.; (c) there is visual disorder; (d) the Defendant was unable to properly perform his/her work due to health; and (e) the Defendant appears to have prevented each of the crimes of this case under economic difficult circumstances; (c) the Defendant appears to have no profit gained by each of the crimes of this case; and (d) the Defendant cooperates with the investigation, such as the Defendant’s expression of the game room unemployment in
However, in light of the fact that the crime related to the illegal game room is highly harmful to society by encouraging the citizens' excessive gambling spirit and hindering sound work awareness, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of during the repeated crime period due to the same kind of crime, the number of game machines and the size of the game room, etc., the crime size is not significant, and the so-called "bow president", which is the defendant's role, not only prevents the proper exercise of State punishment rights by preventing the actual owner of the game room from being subject to criminal punishment, but also prevents the operation of a new game room. As such, there are other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., all the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, crime, motive and consequence, etc., and the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee for each of the crimes of this case, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court for each of the crimes of this case.