logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.12.17 2015노3118
절도등
Text

Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s mistake reflects his/her own mistake; (b) the value of the thief’s damage was not much significant; and (c) the support of his/her daughters is considered.

However, in light of the motive and method of each of the crimes of this case, the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant has been sentenced several times to criminal punishment due to larceny, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case at the same time during the repeated crime period, the defendant was unable to agree with the victims, and he did not make efforts to recover from damage. Other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Commission Sentencing guidelines for each of the crimes of this case, the theft of general property, general theft (type 2), special convicts (type 2), decision on the recommended area (type 10 to 2 years), the scope of recommended sentences (type 4), the scope of recommended sentences (type 10 to 2 years), the number of persons who committed the crime of this case shall be considered in consideration of the same area of general property (type /3).

[) In full view of the result of the management of multiple offenses: 10 months to 3 years and 6 months, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable to the extent that the sentence of the court below is reversed.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow