beta
Text
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) raised in the trial, which were expanded in the trial.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the underlying facts is as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the case where the court orders “ February 5, 2010” to “ February 4, 2010.” as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the same part of the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance is the same.
2. Determination on the main claim
A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to the claim for the share of the purchase price is as follows: (i) the party’s assertion, (ii) this Court’s determination as to the claim for the share of the purchase price is as stated in the 3-A, (b) reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal, deletion, or addition as follows (However, the number and title of each claim are as mentioned above) and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The 33.058 square meters “33,058 square meters” in the 4th judgment of the first instance court shall be cut off with “3.058 square meters”, and the 3rd place on the bottom of the same Myeon shall be deleted “30,000,000 square meters”.
In Chapter 5, "each evidence and evidence mentioned above" are added to the following 1, 12, 6, 7, and 5, 12, 200: "No.5, 1, 2000, 200, 2000, 1,0000,000,000 won, and 1,000,000,000 won, and 1,000,000,000,000 won."
Part 6, "J" shall be changed to "M (hereinafter referred to as "M")".
Part 7: (a) the second class “2010.11”; (b) the 5th class “the same day” in the same 2010; and (c) the 8th class “C” in the same 7th class; and (d) the 8th class “I” in the same 7th class; (b) comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the written evidence Nos. 30-1, 2, and 31, the Plaintiff’s establishment of M and withdrawal of the paid-in capital on the following day after the deposit date; and (c) M was a company with no substantial capital. In light of the contents of each of the above written statements, it is difficult to deem that the 15,000 share shares of M had actual value of KRW 75,00,000.”
CHAPTER 7.14.