The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in this case, did not err by misapprehending the facts that the Defendant convicted of the facts charged in this case, inasmuch as he did not take part in the right scare and knee part of the victim who was protruding the victim by taking out the victim's protruding by leaving the victim's right.

B. The sentence of imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged in the lower court’s determination on the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts were duly examined and adopted in accordance with the evidence, namely, ① the victim was injured by “the framework, closure, closure, and contingent cutting of the outer copy”, and the victim’s doctor stated that these injuries are beyond the fixed state of the shot and occur due to excessive force. ② The victim’s statement at the investigation stage to the lower court, and the Defendant’s statement to the lower court, i.e., G, the victim’s mother, also correspond to the victim’s statement, and ② the Defendant’s mother at the time of the instant crime, 20: (a) the victim’s statement that the bicycle was cut out on April 19, 201; (b) the victim’s statement to the police station beyond 10:28, the victim’s statement to the police station, and (c) the victim’s statement to the effect that it was destroyed by the victim’s photograph and 1; and (d) the victim’s statement to the police station beyond 10.