logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.08 2018고정376
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 08, 2017, around 01:10 on December 08, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim E (here, 27 years of age) in front of the beer Ba; (b) led the victim to commit an indecent act; and (c) led the victim’s left side to talk about five times, with his her indecent act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Analysis of CCTV video recording);

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of a fine for selective punishment (to reflect his/her mistake, to the first offender, to the extent that the degree of conduct is not relatively heavy, and to the circumstances leading to indecent conduct, etc. shall be considered);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse against Children and Juveniles against whom an employment restriction order is exempted: (b) the risk of re-offending is low in light of the details and circumstances of the crime; (c) the initial offender is expected to have the effect of preventing recidivism by registering personal information and ordering a sexual assault treatment program; and (d) the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, and benefit expected by an employment restriction order; and (e) the effect of preventing sex crimes; and (e) the disadvantage and anticipated side effects of

I think)

Where the conviction of this case becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the relevant agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

However, it can be effective to prevent recidivism to a certain extent only with the initial crime, the registration of personal information.

8.3.

arrow