The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim D(n, 41 years old) are those who work together at the "F" medical support team in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E.

Although the Defendant stated in the facts charged on November 3, 2017 as “the December 8, 2017,” the said day appears to be the date of filing a complaint by the victim, and thus, the said day is deemed to be the date of filing a complaint by the victim, and thus, the correction and recognition is given.”

12:20 At around the above F1st floor, the victim was found from the above F1st floor and was shot up with the first floor of the 1st floor, with the above stairs, with the mind of committing an indecent act against the victim's will, and with the hand hand, the victim's tam was feld by force against the victim's will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 3,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (it shall take into consideration the circumstances, such as the reflection of his mistake, the fact that he does not want the punishment of a defendant under an agreement with the victim, the first offender, etc.);

1. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse against Children and Juveniles against whom an employment restriction order is exempted: (b) the risk of re-offending is low in light of the details and circumstances of the crime; (c) the initial offender is expected to have the effect of preventing recidivism by registering personal information and ordering a sexual assault treatment program; and (d) the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, and benefit expected by an employment restriction order; and (e) the effect of preventing sex crimes; and (e) the disadvantage and anticipated side effects of

I think)

The judgment of this case is a conviction of personal information registration.