logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.07.25 2014고단339
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 26, 2014, at around 05:55, the Defendant operated a two-lane of two-lane in the direction of voice in the internal direction from the raw ginseng distance on the north of the petitioner-gun, as Chungcheong, and operated the two-lane in the direction of voice from the internal direction.

The Defendant, while neglecting his duty of care to accurately operate the steering and steering gear, was negligent in the course of business in the course of performing his duty of care, he shocked the shock buffer devices and traffic signs installed in the traffic triangulation zone owned by the victim of the Republic of Korea on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, while destroying shock buffers, etc. which amounted to KRW 754,00,00, failed to take necessary measures, such as moving the Defendant’s motor vehicle in a state that was passed on the two-lane, to a safe area, and escaped as it is.

2. At around 02:30 on March 10, 2014, the Defendant driven a CFD car in the direction of the intersection distance in the early middle of the 208 additional post office, along with the influence of alcohol by 0.086% of the blood alcohol concentration in the 0.08%.

Although the Defendant had a duty of care to walk to the right side of the median line, the Defendant neglected to walk to the right side of the median line and proceeded in the opposite direction, and shocked into the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant did not take necessary measures even after destroying the above vehicle owned by the victim partnershipF to be equivalent to KRW 2,293,838 of the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Each report on actual condition;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act:

arrow