A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) are engaged in driving of B rocketing car.

On April 29, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on April 29, 2015, and driven the intersection of each trade distance in the zone zone in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, along the two-lanes in the direction of viewing water from the side of Gyeonggi-do.

At the same time, there are many vehicles passing through the street intersection where signal lights are installed, and commercial buildings are concentrated in the surrounding areas. In such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went against and proceeded with the signal as it is, instead, received the front portion of the victim C (Nam, 53 years old) driving in the direction of the fixed inspection distance (on the right side of the Defendant’s running direction) from the direction of the fixed inspection distance (on the right side of the Defendant’s running direction), and received the front portion of the victim C(Seoul, 53 years old) from the

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as fluoral salt and tension, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without any necessary measures, such as stopping and providing relief to the victim, even though the said taxi was damaged to the extent that it would amount to KRW 6,200,972, such as the exchange of fluoral pans.

2. The Defendant violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents has received the front part of the Defendant’s car from the front part of the Defendant’s car in front of the passenger car in the direction of the fixed distance (the right side at the left side of the Defendant’s driving direction) from the Madling T-turn’s route, when and at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant violated and proceeded with the signal while driving the said Madren car.