A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Incheon District Court, and on October 17, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the same court on October 17, 201 and completed the execution on June 30, 2014.

On November 23, 2015, around 13:40 on November 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a shock network to the victim D, which was located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and 402; (b) went into the house, and went into the house through its windows; and (c) stolen the 8 clothes and bags owned by the victim.

The Defendant habitually stolen the victims' property at least four times, such as the list of the following crimes.

On November 23, 2015, 13:40 Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 3:40, 13:40, 3:40, 50, 50, 400, 14:40, 14:40 March 8, 2016, the door door door door locked in Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, E and 401, opened and intruded with a shicked salted, and opened and intruded into the property theft f/ hedges, 3:4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 50,000 won in cash, and 4,00,000 won in cash, and the door door door lockeded in 14:40, 205, 3,000, and the summary of evidence.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, G, and I;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Reports on results of field identification, confirmation of fingerprints of special larceny cases, and replies to the results of fingerprint appraisal at the scene of crime;

1. Photographs of each on-site photograph (referred to as the sequence 6, 18 of the evidence list), entrance door damage photographs, and CCTV closures;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The inquiry letter, personal identification and acceptance status of each person, such as text and criminal history;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The fact that the defendant was punished for the same crime or received juvenile protective disposition six times or more for the same crime in addition to the previous criminal records as stated in the first head of the crime as stated in the judgment of the court;